CorX Labs

GLM-5

by Z.ai (Zhipu) · China
Open weightsTool callingMixture of experts200K context

The first GLM-5, roughly doubling the 355B of the GLM-4.5 line, and the first open-weight model to score 50 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.0. Z.ai led its launch on SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench 2.0.


Specification

The numbers

Maker
Z.ai (Zhipu)
Released
2026-02
Parameters
744B total / 40B active
Architecture
MoE
Context window
200,000 tokens
Max output
128,000 tokens
Input
Text
Output
Text
Reasoning
Not reported
Tool calling
Yes
Knowledge cutoff
Not reported
Licence
Not stated
Availability
Not reported
Weights
Downloadable

Cost

Price per million tokens

No public API price. The weights are published, so the only cost is the hardware you run it on.

Published scores

Benchmarks

Figures published by Z.ai (Zhipu) or taken from a public leaderboard. Row last checked 2026-10.

GLM-5 by capability category, with its rank among models reporting the same tests.
CategoryScore Rank
ReasoningMulti-step logic on problems that cannot be looked upNot reported—
MathsCompetition mathematics, graded on the final answerNot reported—
CodingSWE-bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.067.0%4 of 4 reporting the same tests
KnowledgeBreadth of factual recall under exam conditionsNot reported—
MultimodalReading charts, diagrams and photographsNot reported—
Instruction followingObeying an exact, checkable formatNot reported—
Human preferenceWhich answer people pick, blindNot reported—

A category averages every benchmark in it that GLM-5 reports. The rank counts only models that report the same tests, so it never compares an average over three benchmarks against an average over one.

Every reported test

MMLU-ProKnowledgeNot reportedNo figure published
GPQA DiamondReasoningNot reportedNo figure published
AIME 2025MathsNot reportedNo figure published
MATH-500MathsNot reportedNo figure published
SWE-bench VerifiedCoding77.8%Rank 8 of 41 models reporting
SWE-bench ProCodingNot reportedNo figure published
Terminal-Bench 2.0Coding56.2%Rank 5 of 5 models reporting
Terminal-Bench 2.1CodingNot reportedNo figure published
Frontier-Bench v0.1ReasoningNot reportedNo figure published
Terminal-Bench 4.0CodingNot reportedNo figure published
LiveCodeBenchCodingNot reportedNo figure published
HumanEvalCodingNot reportedNo figure published
MMMUMultimodalNot reportedNo figure published
IFEvalInstruction followingNot reportedNo figure published
LMArena EloHuman preferenceNot reportedNo figure published

Where these numbers come from

Every score on this page is a published figure, taken from the model's own card, system card, technical report or release post, or from a public leaderboard. CorX Labs did not run these evaluations. Most are self-reported by the lab that built the model, which means they were produced under that lab's own choice of prompt, scaffold and number of attempts — so treat them as a starting point for a shortlist, not as a settled ranking.

A score someone other than the model's maker measured is marked Independent and names its measurer. Those are the stronger numbers on this page — an outside harness has no reason to flatter anyone — and there are not many of them.

Where a figure has not been published, the cell reads Not reported rather than an estimate. Nothing here is inferred, interpolated or guessed. Each model records the month its row was last checked. Full method and caveats.

Same maker

Other models from Z.ai (Zhipu)

AI models with context window, price per million tokens and published benchmark scores. Sortable by any column.
GLM-5.3Z.ai (Zhipu)Z.ai (Zhipu)1M$1.40$4.40————GLM-5.3 License
GLM-4.6Z.ai (Zhipu)Z.ai (Zhipu)205K$0.60$2.20—82.9%93.9%68%MIT
GLM-4.5Z.ai (Zhipu)Z.ai (Zhipu)131K$0.60$2.20—79.1%91%64.2%MIT
GLM-4.5-AirZ.ai (Zhipu)Z.ai (Zhipu)131K$0.20$1.10—75%89.4%57.6%MIT
GLM-4-9BZ.ai (Zhipu)Z.ai (Zhipu)131K$0.03$0.0645%———GLM License